Libertarian Preisdential Nominee Speaks Out Against the Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act
Currently in the Senate floor politicians are debating the devastating Lieberman-Warner bill that would have a negligible impact on the environment on speculative science. Libertarian Presidential nominee and former GOP Georgia Congressman Bob Barr has issued his own statement about this bill.
Please take a moment to let Congress know that this bill is not in the best interest of the United States. Sign AmericanSolutions.com, Drill Here, Drill Now, Pay Less petition now.
Don't Wreck the Economy In the Name of the Environment Barr Says
Despite the many predictions of doom, "the science of climate change remains highly complex," he says. There has been no warming over the last decade and scientists disagree over how much warming is likely in the future.
To respond to purely speculative problems, Lieberman-Warner would mandate an emission cut of 70 percent by 2050, a virtual impossibility. "It would be hard enough to hold energy use constant with a growing population," he notes. "every additional person needs food, transportation, and housing."
Energy prices would soar. Hundreds of thousands or millions of jobs would be lost. Barr points to a study by the Congressional Budget Office which warns that the Senate bill would hike energy costs $1300 per household, effectively a $1 trillion tax hike over the next decade. "Estimates of the potential GDP loss run into the trillions of dollars," he explains.
Yet climatologists like Dr. Patrick Michaels figure that Lieberman-Warner would cut potential future warming by only .013 degrees (Celsius), "an amount hard to even measure," says Barr. It makes far more sense "to adapt to challenges as they develop than to commit economic suicide to prevent problems that are unlikely to occur."
Post a Comment