Opinion Review: Senator McCain Digs In
In the Sunday April 20th, 2008 Opinion Page of the New York Times, an article was presented showing McCain as an irresponsible presidential candidate by wanting to cut taxes even more. McCain wants to make the Bush tax cuts permanent and to repeal the alternative minimum tax which would save American taxpayers over $1 trillion dollars in taxation that would be utterly wasted by an inefficient federal government on programs they have no Constitutional right to involve themselves in as it is. The opinion actually stated that these two tax cuts would reduce tax revenue to the government.
The Article points out that he wants to double the dependent exemption further reducing tax collections by $171 billion over the next 4 years, suspend the gasoline tax over the summer which would reduce taxes by $10 billion, and finally cut corporate taxes. The author of the article finally points out that McCain has given no way to make up these tax cuts except cutting out loopholes and McCain's favorite action to "cut pork-barrel" spending.
The author concludes that this is all political pandering to buy votes and McCain must go back to the drawing board to show how he would govern without adding to our fiscal problems.
Concluding with the authors opening thoughts. The author opens the article by stating the federal government will not be able to deal with problems of the future such as health care (not in the federal government jurisdiction - state and personal level), road and bridge repair (state and local level jurisdiction), and alternative energy (better handled by the free market, when the people demand it and when it can become economically viable without government subsidies it will occur).
The author of the article clearly misses the point that these issues are not in the federal governments jurisdiction (check the Constitution for your answer on this and then read the 10th Amendment, the answer to all these issues are there) and are all better left to the individual and state levels. Eliminating these costly programs would save Americans billions of dollars each year in unnecessary and inefficient government programs allowing Americans to invest more wisely and with much greater efficiency for their needs.
